by Ronald Alexander Ph.D.

 Abstract: A case focuses on the consequences of decisions by a nationally recognized defendant, former President Donald J. Trump. Mr. Trump presents as a 77-year-old male, born on 14JUN1946 in Jamaica Hospital, in the borough of Queens, New York. Using the two-party
political system, in 2016, as a Republican candidate, he succeeded in winning the office of the
presidency. His decisions, critiqued by several grand juries, have brought him 91 felony
indictments due to criminal activities. Now, the citizens of the United States seek an action by
the judicial branch to solve a dominant, multiple interrelated, social engineered hazard. State and
Federal Judicial systems have evidence from adept prosecutors regarding the defendant’s grave
crimes. This paper recommends a specific, trusted value when evaluating United States Supreme
Court and State Court opinions, comparing historical volatility within insurrections and
rebellions, and arranging judicial outcomes in current events. Due to Mr. Trump’s disqualifying
acts, State Secretaries are authorized and required to exercise and discharge all the powers and
duties conferred by the 14th Amendment Section 3 to remove his name from the ballot for reelection
in 2024. He has attempted to wire his methods into the U.S. judicial system. His
repetitive and historical use of judicial delay modifies the seriousness of his alleged crimes.
Abusing social engineering broadens a potential public support base. These cases test Mr. Trump
as an undefined promoter, functioning as an inverse defendant, persuading participants that they
still hold stocks or shares in his corporate behavior.