Rick Perry’s hidden agenda

by Ronald C. Alexander Ph.D

Evidently, commercial enterprises, steeped in communications, can fall short of their implied role in having concern for public awareness. In their research of an historical event, evidence in published works does include certain choices made by individuals or groups (sets) that reflect recent experiences, based upon specific decisions and not stored knowledge or experiences that highlight maladjustment.

I mean, these sets can force upon the public the idea that there exists only random choices. Instead, other variables would open the public’s eyes to a range of sets belonging to a more favored entity. Transparency in government remains the source for avoiding feelings of transference, an association that dictators often employed, usually through propaganda techniques.

In public office, trust means that others can depend upon the decisions of their elected officials. When politicians withhold pertinent information from the electorate, it opens their private decisions to scrutiny.  Politicians must seek a modern view of inspiring others, offering a clearer vision of government based upon relevant, personal choices. No one having backwater deals, based on a misperception of the social challenges that Texans face, using a personality that emphasizes distrust, should survive political office or any public control expectancies.

Knowing all of our behaviours often can not occur. Notably, the public needs to find the true motives for Rick Perry’s need to produce the following expressions, in contrast to those of the norm.

Well defined parameters must give answers of a measurable type:

Thus an Hilbert Space, or better defined, a subspace, when compressed, satisfies the path of factors distributed and accumulated within any given plane (investing history to measure cultures).

V = vector space
K = field (historical factors)
W = subspace (W holds elements that join V)

Case: The 2014 Texas governor’s race.

Given: James Richard “Rick” Perry (and associates)

1. holds office as governor of Texas
2. lost 2012 Republican nomination for presidency
3. maintains conceptualization of Texas secession issue
4. won political office in Texas, undefeated in nine attempts
5. has two adult children Griffin and Sydney
6. married Anita Thigpen 
7. served in the US Air Force
8. attended Texas A & M University

Variables:

• Measurement  – children’s names
• Parameter – Naming rituals
• Comparative/Historic factor: War and collateral oppression of others

1. Albert Sidney Johnston, Confederate General – killed at Battle of Shiloh, 6APR1862.
2. Albert Sidney Johnston, Union Colonel during Utah War 1857-58 (the Mormon War).
3. Eliza had son named Griffin.
4. They settled at China Grove, part of a garrisoned agricultural system (GAS) in Brazoria County.
5. On October 3, 1843, he married Eliza Griffin, a cousin of his first wife.
6. On January 20, 1829, he married Henrietta Preston.

Conclusion:

A. Subject(s) can not hide this factor.

B. Subject(s) use of dependency on outside factors (i – cultural forces) and/or internal factors (ii – simple-complex seizures) directed to self-actualization.

C. Knowledge of condition in itself describes the error in their tendencies, as explained in their conscious choices and elements found in ritual.

Electa una via, non datur recursus ad alteram.

(He who has chosen one way cannot have recourse to another!)